Thursday, February 28, 2013

Here's Who Voted Against the Violence Against Women Act

Not everyone?in the House of Representatives wanted to pass the Senate's version of the bill to reauthorize the Violence Against Women Act ? which the House succeeded in doing on Thursday afternoon. (The bill is now headed to President Obama,?who has promised to sign it.)

RELATED: Scott Brown's Decision Is Not Good for the GOP

After all, efforts to reauthorize the bill, which funds a bevy of programs designed to helps victims of violence, have languished for more than a year in the GOP-controlled House, whose members have either ignored or tinkered with Senate versions of the reauthorization bill, which provisions funding for the Act for the next five years. (Since expiring at the end of 2011, VAWA has survived on temporary funding.) It's a relief, certainly, but also an opportunity to recognize the Congressmen and -women who?still didn't want to reauthorize an important bill that has?always been reauthorized, without?controversy,?since being passed in 1994.

RELATED: What's Next for the Violence Against Women Act

A total of 138 House members voted against reauthorizing the intact bill, including nine GOP Congressmen ??Paul Broun, Scott Garrett, Louie Gohmert, Tim Huelskamp, Walter Jones, Steve King, Thomas Massie, Tom McClintock and Matt Salmon ? who vowed on Wednesday to strike down?any version of the bill ? even the heavily amended version their colleagues tried to push through (unsuccessfully) before considering, and passing, the Senate's bill.

RELATED: The House GOP Can't Stop the Senate's Violence Against Women Act

And yes, in case you were wondering: House Majority Leader Eric Cantor ? the de facto leader and brain behind the post-2012 Republican Party ? voted nay.

Here's the full list:

  1. Aderholt
  2. Amash
  3. Bachmann
  4. Barton
  5. Bentivolio
  6. Bilirakis
  7. Bishop (UT)
  8. Black
  9. Blackburn
  10. Bonner
  11. Brady (TX)
  12. Bridenstine
  13. Brooks (AL)
  14. Broun (GA)
  15. Burgess
  16. Campbell
  17. Cantor
  18. Carter
  19. Cassidy
  20. Chabot
  21. Chaffetz
  22. Collins (GA)
  23. Conaway
  24. Cotton
  25. Crawford
  26. Culberson
  27. DeSantis
  28. DesJarlais
  29. Duncan (SC)
  30. Duncan (TN)
  31. Ellmers
  32. Fincher
  33. Fleischmann
  34. Fleming
  35. Flores
  36. Forbes
  37. Fortenberry
  38. Foxx
  39. Franks (AZ)
  40. Garrett
  41. Gingrey (GA)
  42. Gohmert
  43. Goodlatte
  44. Gosar
  45. Gowdy
  46. Graves (GA)
  47. Graves (MO)
  48. Griffin (AR)
  49. Griffith (VA)
  50. Guthrie
  51. Hall
  52. Harris
  53. Hartzler
  54. Hastings (WA)
  55. Hensarling
  56. Holding
  57. Hudson
  58. Huelskamp
  59. Huizenga (MI)
  60. Hultgren
  61. Hurt
  62. Johnson (OH)
  63. Jones
  64. Jordan
  65. Kelly
  66. King (IA)
  67. Kingston
  68. Labrador
  69. LaMalfa
  70. Lamborn
  71. Lankford
  72. Latta
  73. Long
  74. Lucas
  75. Luetkemeyer
  76. Lummis
  77. Marchant
  78. Marino
  79. Massie
  80. McCaul
  81. McClintock
  82. Meadows
  83. Mica
  84. Miller (FL)
  85. Mullin
  86. Mulvaney
  87. Murphy (PA)
  88. Neugebauer
  89. Noem
  90. Nunnelee
  91. Olson
  92. Palazzo
  93. Perry
  94. Petri
  95. Pittenger
  96. Pitts
  97. Pompeo
  98. Posey
  99. Price (GA)
  100. Radel
  101. Ribble
  102. Rice (SC)
  103. Roby
  104. Roe (TN)
  105. Rogers (AL)
  106. Rogers (KY)
  107. Rohrabacher
  108. Rooney
  109. Roskam
  110. Ross
  111. Rothfus
  112. Salmon
  113. Scalise
  114. Schweikert
  115. Scott, Austin
  116. Sensenbrenner
  117. Sessions
  118. Smith (NE)
  119. Smith (NJ)
  120. Smith (TX)
  121. Southerland
  122. Stewart
  123. Stockman
  124. Stutzman
  125. Thornberry
  126. Wagner
  127. Walberg
  128. Weber (TX)
  129. Wenstrup
  130. Westmoreland
  131. Whitfield
  132. Williams
  133. Wilson (SC)
  134. Wittman
  135. Wolf
  136. Womack
  137. Woodall
  138. Yoho

And, for old time's sake, here's the list of Senators who voted against the Senate version of the bill in April of 2012:

?

  1. Barrasso (R-WY)
  2. Blunt (R-MO)
  3. Boozman (R-AR)
  4. Burr (R-NC)
  5. Chambliss (R-GA)
  6. Coburn (R-OK)
  7. Cochran (R-MS)
  8. Cornyn (R-TX)
  9. DeMint (R-SC)
  10. Enzi (R-WY)
  11. Graham (R-SC)
  12. Grassley (R-IA)
  13. Hatch (R-UT)
  14. Inhofe (R-OK)
  15. Isakson (R-GA)
  16. Johanns (R-NE)
  17. Johnson (R-WI)
  18. Kyl (R-AZ)
  19. Lee (R-UT)
  20. Lugar (R-IN)
  21. McConnell (R-KY)
  22. Moran (R-KS)
  23. Paul (R-KY)
  24. Risch (R-ID)
  25. Roberts (R-KS)
  26. Rubio (R-FL)
  27. Sessions (R-AL)
  28. Shelby (R-AL)
  29. Thune (R-SD)
  30. Toomey (R-PA)
  31. Wicker (R-MS)

Source: http://news.yahoo.com/heres-voted-against-violence-against-women-act-183434014.html

Honey Boo Boo pirate bay Psalms 91 once upon a time once upon a time bachelor RG3

Online Gaming Signed Into Law in New Jersey | BloodHorse.com

Updated: Wednesday, February 27, 2013 8:37 PM
Posted: Wednesday, February 27, 2013 8:07 AM

Online Gaming Signed Into Law in New Jersey

Photo: AP Photo

New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie

Gov. Chris Christie Feb. 26 signed legislation legalizing Internet gambling through the Atlantic City casinos. The state legislature passed the bill just a few hours earlier.

The law includes changes sought by Christie, including a 10-year trial period for online gaming and a tax of 15% rather than 10%. There are no provisions in the law for horse racing in New Jersey to benefit from online gaming.

New Jersey became the third state in the nation to legalize gambling on the Internet. The lawmakers' votes and Christie's signature marked the largest expansion of legalized gambling in New Jersey since the first casino began operating in Atlantic City in 1978.

Nevada and Delaware have passed laws legalizing Internet betting, which also is going on offshore, untaxed, and unregulated.

"This was a critical decision, and one that I did not make lightly," Christie said. "But with the proper regulatory framework and safeguards that I insisted on including in the bill, I am confident that we are offering a responsible yet exciting option that will make Atlantic City more competitive while also bringing financial benefits to New Jersey as a whole."

The idea is to help the struggling casinos by attracting new gamblers who are not now visiting the casinos. The comps, like free hotel rooms, show tickets, meals or other freebies, would be accrued from online play, but would have to be redeemed in person at a casino, presumably enticing a player to spend more money while there.

Budget figures released by Christie envision contributions to the state Casino Revenue Fund soaring from $235 million this year to $436 million next year, largely due to an influx of online gambling revenue.

The bill will not take effect until the state Division of Gaming Enforcement sets a start date, sometime between three and nine months after the law is signed. Casino executives have estimated it could take six months to a year to get the system up and running.

Casino executives said final rules have to be approved by the gambling enforcement division, but they expect the state to require gamblers to have to appear in person at a casino to open their accounts and verify their age, identity, and other personal information. Payouts could be made remotely to a credit card or bank account when a player cashes out, if the state approves such an arrangement, the executives said.

The law allows gamblers in other states to place bets in New Jersey as long as regulators determine such activity is not prohibited by federal or state law. It even has provisions for allowing people in other countries to play, though federal law would have to be changed before that could happen.

FREE! E-Newsletters from The Blood-Horse!...
Follow the top stories of major racing events, racing previews and results with FREE e-newsletters from bloodhorse.com. As news develops, we'll deliver updates to your inbox. Follow important events moment by moment, step by step!

Source: http://www.bloodhorse.com/horse-racing/articles/76508/online-gaming-signed-into-law-in-new-jersey

hornets prince johan friso windows 8 logo anguilla gone with the wind checkers imbibe

Not-so-golden years: Over 75, burdened by debt

Getty Images stocks

Some people over age 75 appear to be struggling more with debt.

By Allison Linn, TODAY

The golden years are supposed to be a time when you can live off the wealth you?ve accumulated over a lifetime, not feel like you have to take on more debt to make ends meet.

But a new batch of research shows that Americans ages 75 and over appear to have grown more burdened by debt in recent years, and experts say a likely culprit is medical expenses.

A new analysis of government data, released earlier this month by the Employee Benefit Research Institute, found that between 2007 and 2010 people who are 75 and older were more likely to have debt, and their average debt levels increased significantly.

That?s in stark contrast to other older Americans in their 50s and 60s, who generally saw debt levels stabilize during that period.

In general, the good news is that people ages 75 and older are much less likely to have debt, and generally carry far less debt, than other older Americans. But Craig Copeland, a senior research associate with EBRI and the report?s author, said it was still troubling to see that the trend for that group was toward increasing, rather than decreasing, debt burdens.

?It really looked like something wasn?t going well for them,? Copeland said.

He suspects that many Americans who are 75 and older have few options but to take on debt when a big unexpected expense arises, because many are living on fixed retirement incomes and don?t work. That means they can?t, say, work a few extra hours or take on a second job if they need to pay for something.

That unexpected expense may be health-related. Although most older Americans are covered by Medicare, Copeland noted that many are still on the hook for co-pays and other out-of-pocket expenses.

That means a person with a limited income can have their finances thrown into disarray by one unexpected event, such as a broken hip that requires significant co-pays or the sudden need for a very expensive prescription that isn?t fully covered.

?In a lot of cases it seems to be that health care is a particularly vexing issue,? he said.

The percentage of people 75 and above who had debt grew from 31.2 percent in 2007, the year the nation went into recession, to 38.5 percent in 2010, a year after the recession officially ended, according to the EBRI?s analysis of Census data. The average amount of debt for those with debt also more than doubled, from $13,665 in 2007 to $27,409 in 2010.

The debt loads were far greater for people in their 50s and 60s, but the trend lines were far less troubling. The percentage of people ages 55 to 64 who held debt fell from 81.7 percent to 77.6 percent. For people ages 65 to 74, the percentage holding debt held steady at about 65 percent.

The average debt for 55- to 64-year-old debtholders fell from $112,075 in 2007 to $107,060 in 2010. For people ages 65 to 74, average debt fell from $72,922 in 2007 to $70,875 in 2010.

It makes sense for younger people to have more debt because they are still paying off big expenses, like houses, and they also are more likely to be bringing home a paycheck. By the time you reach your mid-70s, many would expect to have paid off the house and retired from regular work.

For people 75 and older, Copeland said his research showed that both median credit card and housing debt increased for those who had those types of debt.

Lucia Dunn, an economist at The Ohio State University, said her more recent research also has shown that older Americans have been taking on more credit card debt in recent years. She also suspects that unexpected medical expenses are a key problem for that group.

But in general, she said the really troubling finding she?s seeing is that younger Americans appear to be taking on more debt than previous generations, and paying it off at slower rates.

That could mean that today?s young people have even bigger problems than their parents and grandparents when they reach age 75 and older.

?The elderly are taking it in (but) not as fast as the younger ones,? she said. ?The really young cohorts are really digging a hole for themselves.?

Source: http://lifeinc.today.com/_news/2013/02/26/17090279-not-so-golden-years-over-75-burdened-by-debt?lite

angelina jolie right leg saving face academy award winners best picture 2012 oscar winners channel 3 news j lo

Wednesday, February 27, 2013

A look at the deadliest hot air balloon accidents

Tuesday's crash of a hot air balloon near Egypt's ancient city of Luxor, killing 19 tourists, surpasses what ballooning experts believed to have been the deadliest accident in the sport's 200-year history, a 1989 crash in Australia that left 13 dead.

Some of the worst accidents involving recreational hot air balloons:

? Feb. 26, 2013: A hot air balloon flying over Luxor, in southern Egypt, caught fire and plunged 300 meters (1,000 feet) to the ground, crashing into a sugar cane field and killing at least 19 foreign tourists.

? Aug. 23, 2012: Six people died and 26 were injured when a hot air balloon carrying 32 people, mostly tourists including some children, caught fire and crashed near the Slovenian capital of Ljubljana.

? Jan. 07, 2012: A hot air balloon struck power lines near Carterton, New Zealand and exploded, crashing to the ground and killing all 11 people on board.

? Oct. 14, 2009: Four Dutch tourists were killed in Guangxi, China, after pilots lost control and their hot air balloon burst into flames and crashed.

? Aug. 26, 2001: Six people including a child were killed when their hot air balloon touched a power line at Verrens-Arvey, in southwestern France.

? June 17, 1999: Four passengers were killed when their hot air balloon hit a power line near Ibbenburen, Germany.

? Jan. 31, 1996: Five people died in the Bernese Alps, Switzerland when their hot air balloon crashed into a mountainside at a height of 2,400 meters (8,000 feet).

? Aug. 8, 1993: Six people were killed when their balloon hit a power line near Aspen, Colorado, tearing off the basket and sending it plunging 30 meters (100 feet) to the ground.

? Dec. 11, 1990: Four people died near downtown Columbus, Ohio, after their hot air balloon hit a television tower and deflated.

? Oct. 6, 1990: Four people were killed in a balloon crash at Gaenserndorf, near Vienna.

? Aug. 13, 1989: Thirteen people were killed when their hot air balloon collided with another over the Australian outback near the town of Alice Springs. The two balloons were flying at an altitude of 600 meters (2,000 feet) when one plunged to the ground after the collision.

? Oct. 3, 1982: An explosion on board a hot air balloon carrying 9 people at a festival in Albuquerque, New Mexico killed four people and injured five.

? Aug. 6, 1981: Five people were killed and one seriously injured when a hot air balloon caught fire after touching electrical wires and crashed in a suburb of Chicago.

? 1785: Two Frenchmen attempting to cross the English Channel in a hot-air balloon were killed when their balloon caught fire and crashed, in possibly the first fatal aviation accident.

Sources: AP reporting and news reports. Compiled by AP News Researcher Jennifer Farrar.

Source: http://news.yahoo.com/look-deadliest-hot-air-balloon-accidents-174018300.html

Amber Tamblyn Lilit Avagyan Nashville TV Show VP debate drew brees drew brees sandusky

Scientists reconstruct Russia meteor trajectory

Relying on videos of the meteor as it streaked across the sky over the Ural mountains, a pair of Colombian astronomers say they have reconstructed the space rock's orbit.

By Eoin O'Carroll,?Staff / February 26, 2013

This dashcam video frame grab shows a meteor streaking across the sky of Russia?s Ural Mountains earlier this month.

Nasha gazeta/www.ng.kz/AP/File

Enlarge

A duo of Colombian scientists say they have reconstructed the orbit of the meteor that exploded earlier this month over?Chelyabinsk, Russia.?

Skip to next paragraph

' + google_ads[0].line2 + '
' + google_ads[0].line3 + '

'; } else if (google_ads.length > 1) { ad_unit += ''; } } document.getElementById("ad_unit").innerHTML += ad_unit; google_adnum += google_ads.length; return; } var google_adnum = 0; google_ad_client = "pub-6743622525202572"; google_ad_output = 'js'; google_max_num_ads = '1'; google_feedback = "on"; google_ad_type = "text"; google_adtest = "on"; google_image_size = '230x105'; google_skip = '0'; // --> This is a virtual exploration of th epreliminary orbit computed by Zuluaga & Ferrin (2013). Scientific details can be found at arxiv:1302.5377

Relying on videos of the meteor from?Chelyabinsk's Revolutionary Square?and in the nearby city of Korkino, astronomers Jorge Zuluaga and Ignacio Ferrin at the University of Antioquia in Medellin, Colombia, triangulated the speed and position of the meteorite as it fell to Earth.

Zuluaga and?Ferrin's?conclusion rests on the assumptions that a 20-foot hole in the ice of?Lake Chebarkul was caused by a fragment of the meteor, and that this fragment was traveling along the same trajectory as its parent body. Divers have yet to find a meteorite in the lake.?

The pair were inspired by blogger Stefan Geens, who analyzed video of the shadows cast by light poles in?Revolutionary Square as the blazing meteor passed overhead. Using simple trigonometry, Geens estimated the path of the meteor, noticing that it squared nicely with an image of the meteor's contrail that just happened to have been picked up by a European weather satellite.?

In a paper published online at arXiv.org,?Zuluaga and?Ferrin took Geen's analysis further, using a gravitational analysis to reconstruct the path of the rock going back four years before impact. Their analysis indicates that the meteor was one of the Apollo asteroids, a class of space rocks whose elongated orbits occasionally cross that of our planet. There are about 5,200 known Apollo asteroids, the largest of them being 1866 Sisyphus, a six-mile wide rock discovered in 1972. Sisyphus is comparable in size to the impactor thought to have caused a global extinction event some 66 million years ago, ending the age of the dinosaurs.?

In an effort to prevent a repeat of this sort of event, European Space Agency officials announced a plan to smash a spacecraft into an Apollo asteroid?in 2022?to alter its orbit, just for practice. The target of the joint European/US Asteroid Impact and Deflection Assessment mission, a rock named?65803 Didymos, poses no threat to our planet in the?foreseeable?future, unless of course the mission goes seriously wrong and Didymos is knocked into our path.??

Source: http://rss.csmonitor.com/~r/feeds/science/~3/Lowgxnji-pw/Scientists-reconstruct-Russia-meteor-trajectory

indy 500 angelina jolie leg daytona artie lange nascar daytona 2012 kasey kahne angelina jolie right leg

Text Mode Makes Web Pages Less Distracting

Text Mode Makes Web Pages Less DistractingChrome: Great apps like Readability turn web pages into a format more easy on the eyes, but sometimes you just want less of a distraction rather than an entirely new look. Text Mode blocks out all images and flash components on a web page and puts everything into grayscale for distraction-free web browsing.

As depicted in the screenshot above, text is rendered about the same?just without color. Images, however, become a diagonal striped pattern so you can focus entirely on the written word. To activate Text Mode, you just click on the installed extension button and let it fly. To turn it off, just click the button again. The only very minor issue is that Text Mode doesn't work in Hi-DPI mode (e.g. on retina MacBook Pros and computers like them) but that won't affect the majority of users. If you're looking for a simple way to make web pages less distracting, all you need is Google Chrome and this free extension.

Text Mode (Free) | Chrome Web Store via Addictive Tips

Source: http://feeds.gawker.com/~r/lifehacker/full/~3/PuJ3D50pi18/text-mode-makes-web-pages-less-distracting

earthquake california earthquake california roy orbison the third man 2012 nfl draft order mohamed sanu chris polk

Tuesday, February 26, 2013

Live from ASUS' press event at MWC 2013!

Live from ASUS' press event at MWC 2013!

So far, we don't know much about what ASUS will be announcing here at Mobile World Congress, but we do know it has something to do with a spaceship landing on top of Barcelona's La Sagrada Familia. And also, a statue of Columbus talking on the phone in Spanish. Obviously, dockable gadgets are key -- in fact, if you watch that second video, ASUS even uses the tagline "Pad and Phone come together." So we're gonna go out on a limb and say a new PadFone is in order. But what about the specs? And how about some new Transformer tablets? Only one way to find out: stay tuned as we report live from the company's MWC press event, happening right now.

February 25, 2013 7:00 AM EST

Filed under: , , ,

Comments

Source: http://feeds.engadget.com/~r/weblogsinc/engadget/~3/BI7LBjvTvDg/

bulls heat goldman sachs brandon carr knicks coach encyclopedia britannica pi white lion

Monday, February 25, 2013

House Intel chair: Chinese cyber attacks 'unprecedented'

House Intelligence Committee Chair Mike Rogers, R-Mich., said it was "beyond a shadow of a doubt" that the Chinese government and military is behind growing cyber attacks against the United States, saying "we are losing" the war to prevent the attacks.

"They use their military and intelligence structure to steal intellectual property from American businesses, and European businesses, and Asian businesses, re-purpose it and then compete in the international market against the United States," Rogers said this morning on "This Week."

"It is unprecedented," Rogers added. "This has never happened in the history of the world, where one nation steals the intellectual property to re-purpose it - to illegally compete against the country?and I'll tell you, It is as bad as I've ever seen it and exponentially getting worse. Why? There's no consequence for it."

American businesses have been hesitant to complain about Chinese cyber espionage due to fears of losing opportunities in the growing economic power, according to ABC News' George Will.

"They're dealing with a very difficult, frankly a gangster regime in China right now," Will said. "And no one wants to make them unhappy."

While Will noted that the U.S. also engages in cyber espionage, citing attacks against the computer systems running Iran's nuclear facilities, Rogers said that the difference is the U.S. does not seek economic gain as the Chinese have.

"This is an important difference. The United States does not participate, use its military intelligence services for economic espionage," Rogers said. "We do not do it. It's prohibited."

Rep. Eliot Engel, D-NY, ranking member of the House Foreign Affairs Committee, said that there have to be greater consequences for Chinese cyber espionage, calling for sanctions and indictments against those responsible, as well as limiting access to visas.

"I think we have to make it very clear to them that they - this cannot be business as usual," Engel said. "If they're going to continue to do this to the extent that they're doing it, there's a price to pay."

Rogers agreed that the U.S. should pursue criminal action against cyber espionage to send a message to China that "if you want to be an international player, you can't act like a thief in the night."

"If someone comes into your office and steals your sensitive intellectual property and walks out the door with it, that's a crime," Rogers said. "What difference does it make if I do it in person or I do it through my computer?"

Beyond economic concerns, the cyber attacks have increasingly focused on areas that may become a national security threat.

A report in The New York Times last week outlined links between the Chinese military and cyber attacks against the U.S. focused on companies tied to American infrastructure, including the power grid and oil and gas lines.

"Here's the scary part of this. It's already part of military planning for the Russians, for the Chinese, and here's where it gets interesting. Now, the Iranians," Rogers said, citing a sophisticated attack on a Saudi company by Iran.

Will said that such attacks may be seen as a way for China and other nations to compete with the U.S. militarily.

"What if China is thinking, look, we can try and compete with the United States. Build a big blue water Navy and aircraft carriers and all the rest, or maybe we can just learn how to disable the massive infrastructure of our potential? adversary," Will said. "There's an intellectual blank slate right now on which the international community needs to write rules and laws about a new form of weapons."

But Rogers warned that the U.S. is not yet prepared to deter such cyber attacks from continuing.

"If you're going to punch your neighbor in the nose, best to hit the weight room for a couple of months," Rogers said. "We're not ready yet, we are completely vulnerable to this."

Also Read

Source: http://news.yahoo.com/house-intel-chair-mike-rogers-calls-chinese-cyber-180030656--abc-news-politics.html

stock market Obama Acceptance Speech 2012 dow jones Selena Gomez ariel winter Paige Butcher David Petraeus

100%, 99%, 80%, 70% ? How Much Can & Should The World Be Powered By Renewable Energy?

Solar panel, wind turbine & globe via Shutterstock

How much can/should the world be powered by renewable energy? Or how about your country or region? A number of studies have tackled this question, and I recently realized that we hadn?t stuck them all together in one easy-to-find place. So, I created this page specifically for that purpose:?70%, 80%, 99.9%, 100% Renewables ? Study Central.

Keep that page bookmarked ? it will be updated with new major studies on this topic as they are produced. (I?ll also stick it in our sidebar on the right so that it?s super easy to access for CleanTechnica readers ? I know, I love you.)

Image Credit:?Solar panel, wind turbine & globe?via Shutterstock

Source: http://feeds.importantmedia.org/~r/IM-cleantechnica/~3/X41GrwWqVSI/

ashley olsen new apple tv sun flare love hewitt new ipad solar flare joseph kony 2012

Red Wing's mayor resigns in face of pressure over his frac sand industry role (Star Tribune)

Share With Friends: Share on FacebookTweet ThisPost to Google-BuzzSend on GmailPost to Linked-InSubscribe to This Feed | Rss To Twitter | Politics - Top Stories Stories, RSS and RSS Feed via Feedzilla.

Source: http://news.feedzilla.com/en_us/stories/politics/top-stories/286942208?client_source=feed&format=rss

internet blackout jessica capshaw

Sunday, February 24, 2013

Horse meat in US? Unlikely, but tests are rare

Leonhard Foeger / Reuters

An employee of the microbiological laboratory of the Austrian Agency for Health and Food Safety prepares a sample of minced meat in Vienna this week. The samples of minced meat are tested for the presence of horse meat as a precaution. United States officials say it's highly unlikely the scandal will reach U.S. consumers.

By JoNel Aleccia, Staff Writer, NBC News

Europe?s scandal over horse meat hidden in beef products -- including recalls of Nestle ravioli and Birds Eye chili con carne -- has renewed questions about whether Americans unwittingly could be eating equine products as well.

U.S. Department of Agriculture regulators say it?s highly unlikely that beef adulterated with horse meat could make it to the nation?s dinner plates because no domestic suppliers currently slaughter horses and the agency has strict labeling and inspection standards for imported meat.

But agency officials also acknowledge privately that species testing for meat imported into the U.S. is performed typically only when there?s a reason to question a shipment.

And a Florida company that supplies the only validated tests for horse meat in food has been slammed with nearly 1,000 requests in recent weeks for its $500 kits -- including orders from major U.S. meat producers.

?It?s becoming a little hectic,? said Natalie Rosskopf, administrative director of Elisa Technologies Inc. of Gainesville. ?There was no call for horse testing a month ago. Nothing.?

Continental Europe has been roiled recently by reports of horse meat masquerading as beef in frozen burgers and prepared foods, including frozen dinners and pastas. This week, Nestle announced it was removing chilled pasta products produced by a German supplier, including Buitoni Beef Ravioli and Beef Tortellini, from stores in Italy and Spain, and a lasagna product from France. On Friday, frozen food maker Birds Eye said it would withdraw products including chili con carne from Britain and Ireland because tests detected traces of horse DNA.

The trouble with horse meat hidden in beef is partly a health concern. Meats taken from store shelves in Britain and Germany had traces of a powerful equine painkiller, phenylbutazone, or ?bute,? which is banned in animals destined for human food, tests showed.

But it?s also about trust, especially in the U.S., where many shudder at the mere thought of eating horse meat and the deception would raise even more suspicion about a company?s practices.

?If a company is willing to commit fraud, I can?t imagine that food safety is the biggest thing on their agenda,? said Bill Marler, a Seattle lawyer and food safety expert who publishes a blog focused on the industry.

In fact, boneless beef adulterated with horse meat -- and with kangaroo -- did make it to the U.S. more than 30 years ago, when mislabeled meat from Australia led to the impounding and testing of 66 million pounds of the product, according to old USDA records found and posted by Marler.

Known as the ?Australian meat incident,? the beef substitution scandal prompted swift action and increased scrutiny by agency officials.

USDA officials couldn?t quickly produce records of species testing results in the past 30 years -- or even the past year -- but they say the possibility of that happening again is remote. The U.S. neither slaughters horses nor imports horse meat from other countries, and it doesn?t allow import of beef from the countries and companies involved in the European scandal, an official told NBC News. (He was speaking on background because he said he wasn?t authorized to discuss the issue.)

In addition, USDA inspectors look at every shipment of meat sent through U.S. ports and can demand species testing if anything is amiss, documents show.

Officials with the Food and Drug Administration, which oversees processed foods, said that they had detected no horse meat in imported or U.S.-made food.?

?We have no past record or current indication that horse meat is an ingredient in any FDA-regulated processed foods in the U.S.,? Jalil Isa, an FDA spokesman, said in an email. He added that FDA officials are reaching out to Nestle and Birds Eye to ensure that no adulterated food was sent to the U.S. Nestle has said no U.S. products use meat from European sources.

Birds Eye Iglo U.K. products have no connection to the Birds Eye brand in the U.S., which is owned by Pinnacle Foods, and isn?t affiliated with the U.K. supplier.

Producers such as the meat giant Cargill say they don?t import beef from plants that also slaughter horses, or from the companies and suppliers implicated in the European scandal, and they remain confident that their meat is free of adulteration.

?Cargill?s beef supply chain is shorter than those involved in the horse meat issue in Europe and we know, and work directly with, our suppliers, which minimizes the potential for fraudulent substitution of products,? Cargill spokesman Mike Martin told NBC News in an email.

Still, the problems in Europe could prompt renewed scrutiny, he added.

?We do not analyze for other species and are assessing the current situation to determine if this is something we might do in the future,? Martin said.

If they do, they?ll have to turn to Elisa Technologies for the horse species test, said Rosskopf. The company?s meat species kits, which verify animal proteins in raw and cooked meat samples, have been used for years by the USDA and by private firms, she said.

Before the discovery in Europe of horse meat in beef, the firm?s typical demand was for tests for more common species, for instance, to confirm that no pork was present in kosher meat, Rosskopf said. Now, meat suppliers mostly in Europe, but also in the U.S., have been clamoring for the equine test.

Have there been any positive tests so far?

?I can?t say,? said Rosskopf, noting that the company is known for its adherence to confidentiality agreements.

Of course, putting horse meat on the dinner table is common in many countries, including France, Canada, Mexico and Japan, to name a few. And it?s not unheard of on American menus, either. Slaughterhouses that produced horse meat for human consumption were in operation in the U.S. until 2007, when the last three of a one-time high of 16 or 17 plants closed under state and federal pressure.

Congress effectively banned the practice then by refusing to fund USDA inspections of the slaughterhouses. Those efforts were fueled by vocal anti-slaughter activists who regarded the practice as inhumane.

The arrangement stayed in place until 2011, when the Obama administration quietly lifted the restriction, partly out of concern for the neglect of horses in the U.S. and the treatment of horses that were shipped to Canada and Mexico to be killed.

The U.S. exported more than 46,000 metric tons of horse meat in 1990, a figure that fell to about 5,600 metric tons in 2007, when the ban was enacted, industry figures show.

Wyoming state Rep. Sue Wallis is trying to reinstate horse slaughter in the U.S. and to build a new source for the meat in America and abroad.

Her application is among those pending with the USDA to open horse slaughterhouses in Missouri, Iowa and New Mexico. The firms would produce what she and other advocates call ?cheval,? horse meat that she said is prized by gourmet cooks and health enthusiasts for its taste and lean profile. Plus, Wallis said, horse meat is generally about 40 percent cheaper than beef.

?There are plenty of people in America who have no problem with cheval and are anxiously awaiting our product,? she said.

Related stories:

Source: http://vitals.nbcnews.com/_news/2013/02/22/17059607-horse-meat-unlikely-on-us-dinner-plates-but-testing-is-rare?lite

madonna super bowl performance madonna half time m.i.a super bowl coin toss best superbowl commercials madonna super bowl halftime kelly clarkson super bowl

John F. Kennedy's Black History Significance Very Complex

-- Not that many years ago, three portraits hung in thousands of African-American homes, a visual tribute to men who had helped black people navigate the long journey to equality.

There was Jesus, who represented unconditional hope, strength and love. There was Martin Luther King Jr., who personified the moral crusade that ended legal segregation. And then there was President John F. Kennedy.

Kennedy's inclusion may seem puzzling, considering that his civil rights legacy has undergone substantial reassessment since his Nov. 22, 1963, assassination. But a look at why so many black people revered him then ? and why younger generations have largely forgotten his civil rights work ? shows that even 50 years later, Kennedy holds an important but complicated place in black history.

"We're still trying to figure it out," says John Mack, a longtime civil rights activist who was fighting segregation in Atlanta when Kennedy was elected president in 1960.

Mack says that we can only speculate on what Kennedy might have done for civil rights had he not been killed.

"It's a question we're wrestling with and cannot answer," Mack says.

___

For many older African-Americans, Kennedy was a president who sympathized with black struggle like no other before him.

They recall him speaking eloquently against segregation despite resistance from Southern racists in his own Democratic party. Some even feel that his support for civil rights was one reason he was killed, even though racial motives are not prominent among the many theories about Kennedy's death.

Yes, these black folks say, Kennedy may have moved reluctantly on civil rights. Yes, he may have been motivated by the need for votes more than racial justice ? but they speak of the effort he made.

"People say he should have moved faster, but he's dead because of the pace that he did move," says Rev. Shirley Jordan, a pastor and community activist in her native Richmond, Va.

She was 13 when Kennedy was shot in Dallas. She heard the news in school, she recalls, but especially felt the impact when she got home: "My mother cried as though it was her child who had died."

"That was just the tone, the aura. There was a big cloud over the whole black community," Jordan says. "When you look at the pictures of the funeral, you see so many black people out there."

Later, Jordan's parents hung Kennedy's portrait next to King's in their housing project apartment.

Such portraits also were a common sight in black homes for Rev. Charles Booth, who grew up in Baltimore.

"You always saw pictures of Jesus Christ, John F. Kennedy, Dr. Martin Luther King," says Booth, now a pastor in Columbus, Ohio. "You could go in an average home and see a picture of JFK on the wall. In the minds of most black people at the time, he was a friend to the African-American community."

One reason why, Booth says, was Kennedy's relationship with King ? though that, too, was complicated.

They first met in June 1960. Kennedy, then a senator from Massachusetts, would soon win the Democratic presidential nomination. King had become a national figure for leading the victorious bus boycott in Montgomery, Ala., that ignited the civil rights movement.

As a Democrat, running against Republican Richard Nixon (at the time, many influential blacks, including Jackie Robinson, were Republicans), Kennedy faced some difficult racial calculus.

The South, where Jim Crow kept black people in a second-class status, was ruled by Democrats. To win the presidency, Kennedy needed white Southern Democrats, and many of them hated King, whom they saw as a threat to their way of life.

In a speech soon after meeting King, Kennedy spoke of the "moving examples of moral courage" shown by civil rights protesters. Their peaceful demonstrations, he said, were not "to be lamented, but a great sign of responsibility, of good citizenship, of the American spirit."

Referencing the growing "sit-in" movement, in which black customers demanded service at white-only restaurants, Kennedy said: "It is in the American tradition to stand up for one's rights ? even if the new way to stand up for one's rights is to sit down."

But there was another side to Kennedy's stance.

Behind the scenes, his aides were urging King to end his nonviolent protests, according to historian Taylor Branch in his authoritative civil rights chronicle "Parting the Waters."

Since the protests were being suppressed by Democrats, they made it harder for Kennedy to get black votes in the North. But if Kennedy criticized the suppression, he would lose white votes in the South.

Declining to heed Kennedy's men and curtail protests, King was arrested with a group of students at an Atlanta sit-in on Oct. 19, 1960, scant weeks before the excruciatingly close election. King refused to post bail. He remained behind bars as the Ku Klux Klan marched through Atlanta streets and Kennedy and Nixon held their final televised debate.

Authorities produced a 5-month-old traffic ticket from a neighboring county, and King was sentenced to four months' hard labor. By the next morning King was in a maximum-security prison. Many feared he would soon be killed.

Over the objections of Kennedy's brother and campaign manager, Robert Kennedy, who wanted to steer clear of the matter, an aide managed to convince the candidate to place a sympathetic call to King's pregnant wife, Coretta.

News of Kennedy's call was leaked to reporters. Yet King was still in jail ? until Robert Kennedy called the judge. Suddenly, bail was granted and King was freed.

The story of the Kennedys' involvement made headlines in black newspapers nationwide. King issued a statement saying he was "deeply indebted to Senator Kennedy," although he remained nonpartisan. The Kennedy campaign printed tens of thousands of pamphlets describing the episode, and distributed them in black churches across the country on the Sunday before the election.

Kennedy, who got 78 percent of the black vote, won the election by one of the narrowest margins in U.S. history.

"In an election that close," says Villanova University professor David Barrett, "you could make a case that Kennedy's call to Coretta mattered enough to win."

Booth, the Ohio pastor, has pondered Kennedy's motivations.

"I don't know if a large number of African-Americans thought critically about Kennedy's shrewdness," Booth says. "He was very much courting that Southern vote. Politicians do what politicians do. The political reality may not always be the ethical reality."

___

As president, Kennedy's top priority was foreign policy. There were enormous Cold War challenges ? from the Soviet Union and Vietnam to Cuba, site of the failed Bay of Pigs invasion and of a crisis over Soviet missiles that threatened to trigger nuclear war.

Meanwhile, at home, the boiling civil rights movement could not be ignored.

"Freedom Riders" seeking to integrate Southern bus lines were mercilessly beaten. Whites rioted to prevent the black student James Meredith from enrolling at the University of Mississippi; two people were killed after Kennedy sent in Army forces to ensure Meredith's admission.

In Birmingham, Ala., police loosed clubs, dogs and fire hoses on peaceful protesters, and a church bombing killed four black girls. Images of the violence shamed America before the world.

As blood flowed, Kennedy moved cautiously toward civil rights legislation.

Publicly, Kennedy's administration was reluctant to intervene in the Southern violence unless federal law was being flouted. Privately, Kennedy's men urged protest leaders to slow down and avoid confrontation.

Many saw the administration's stance as aloof or even helpless. Earlier, after Kennedy had disowned proposals that were part of the Democrats' 1960 campaign platform, NAACP president Roy Wilkins said Kennedy was offering "a cactus bouquet."

Mack, the civil rights activist, was at the Democratic convention where those promises were made. He recalls being highly frustrated with Kennedy's pace once he became president.

"We were deeply committed young people who were out to change the system. Down in the South we were fighting segregation in all its original ugliness," Mack says.

But amid the frustration, Mack says, there was recognition among movement leaders that Kennedy was politically constrained.

"He had to deal with some segregationists," Mack says.

Kennedy needed some of those segregationists to advance his foreign policy agenda, says Barrett, the Villanova professor. He also had to think about reelection, and not alienating white Southern voters.

"Civil rights simply was not a top priority," says Barrett, who studies the Kennedy administration and teaches a course on the civil rights movement.

"He was busy with so many other issues, especially foreign policy issues, he didn't give it the kind of energy and attention that we might wish in retrospect," he says.

Civil rights was a top priority ? in a different way ? for J. Edgar Hoover, head of the FBI.

Hoover believed the growing civil rights movement was under Communist influence and a threat to national security. He closely monitored King and others in the movement with surveillance, informants and wiretaps.

In 1963, "the FBI assigned full enemy status to King," Branch wrote, noting that even "after receiving intelligence that someone was trying to kill him, the Bureau would refuse to warn King as it routinely warned other potential targets."

Yet Kennedy still worked with King, even as his FBI tried to tear King down.

In June 1963, King had a private meeting with Kennedy at the White House. During a stroll through the Rose Garden, the president told King that he was under surveillance.

"He was playing both sides of the issue," Barrett says.

A few minutes after Kennedy's warning, he and King joined a meeting with other civil rights leaders. The March on Washington had been announced, and Kennedy had hinted publicly that he was against it. Someone in the meeting asked if that was true.

"We want success in the Congress, not a big show on the Capitol," Kennedy replied, according to "Parting the Waters."

In the end, the peaceful mass march made headlines around the world.

Kennedy watched it on television. Immediately afterward, he met with march leaders in the White House, where they discussed civil rights legislation that was finally inching through Congress. The leaders pressed Kennedy to strengthen the legislation; the president listed many obstacles.

Some believe Kennedy preferred to wait until after the 1964 election to push the issue. Yet in his public speeches, he spoke more and more about justice for all.

La Trice Washington, a professor at Otterbein College in Ohio, says some of Kennedy's rhetoric went "well beyond sympathetic." As an example, she cites a graduation speech at San Diego State College on June 11, 1963.

"Our goal must be an educational system in the spirit of the declaration of independence ? a system in which all are created equal," Kennedy said. "A system in which every child, whether born a banker's son in a Long Island mansion, or a Negro sharecropper's son in an Alabama cotton field, has every opportunity for an education that his abilities and character deserve."

Those were dangerous words, Washington says.

"That was not acceptable language by the dominant culture," she says. "That puts you on the front lines. It puts you on the line not only for political retribution, but for death."

___

Fifty years later, except for the aging few who recall the portraits on the walls, Kennedy is not widely remembered as a civil rights icon. During this Black History Month, his name has been seldom mentioned.

His successor, President Lyndon Johnson, receives credit for hammering through the monumental Civil Rights Act and Voting Rights Act, which ensured full citizenship for African-Americans.

"Kennedy was sort of remade after his death," says Allan Saxe, a professor at the University of Texas at Arlington who has researched Kennedy and civil rights. "He did speak on civil rights, he talked about it, but he never got much legislation through."

Barrett, the Villanova professor, says Kennedy was moving, however slowly, toward a "full steam ahead" approach to civil rights ? and then he was killed.

"I don't think he ever developed an emotional or gut level commitment on this issue. He's memorialized that way, but I don't think he got there," Barrett says.

Today, the hard facts of history can be unforgiving. But for black people who lived that history, a cautious hand extended can feel like an embrace.

"When I think about his compassion for people, I also think about Martin Luther King," says Jordan, the Richmond pastor. She believes Kennedy is a martyr for black people, "because a martyr is someone who died for what they believed."

Mack, the civil rights activist, admires him still.

Whether Kennedy might have achieved anything substantial on civil rights ? "that's the unknown," he acknowledges.

Still, he adds, "Being as young as I was, I saw him as a breath of fresh air. Youthful, dynamic, a new visionary type of leader. I felt a lot of optimism and hope. I felt that in time, if we kept up our advocacy, he would deal with issues important to our people."

___

Jesse Washington covers race and ethnicity for The Associated Press. He is reachable at or jwashington(at)ap.org. http://www.twitter.com/jessewashington

"; var coords = [-5, -72]; // display fb-bubble FloatingPrompt.embed(this, html, undefined, 'top', {fp_intersects:1, timeout_remove:2000,ignore_arrow: true, width:236, add_xy:coords, class_name: 'clear-overlay'}); });

Source: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/02/23/john-f-kennedys-black-his_n_2751563.html

Sandy Hook Hoax 2014 Corvette Stacie Halas Corvette Stingray Claire Danes quentin tarantino jessica chastain

Google Glass to launch this year for under $1,500

Everyone's favorite future toy, Google Glass, may soon be more than a gadget-blogger's fantasy. Tech website The Verge has gotten official confirmation from Google that they plan to launch the head-worn device before the end of the year, and for under $1,500.

If you feel the price is bit much to ask for a pair of dorky-looking cyber-glasses, you're not alone. But there are two things you can count on: that the first generation of a new kind of device will always be both expensive and a little clunky, and that people will buy it anyway.

$1,500 is what Google charged developers who wanted early access to the device, and a recently-launched contest with Glass as a reward still requires the winner to pay that sum (and pick it up in person, no less). But they told The Verge that a "fully-polished" version of the device would be out by the end of the year and would cost less ? though they didn't say by how much.

If you're curious about Glass, you can visit Google's new site dedicated to it or watch the demonstration video below:

Devin Coldewey is a contributing writer for NBC News Digital. His personal website is coldewey.cc.

Source: http://www.nbcnews.com/technology/gadgetbox/google-glass-launch-year-under-1-500-1C8503747

8 bit google maps kids choice awards 2012 micah true kansas vs ohio state winning mega million numbers bruce weber boston globe

Pertino


Services and applications continually move to the cloud; so why not networking? Pertino allows you to create an on-the-fly network in the cloud. You can add to your network devices you use everyday such as file servers, computers, printers, and fax machines. Then invite others users to connect to the network and share these devices no matter where you, the devices or invited users are located. Pertino is an example of the emerging Networking-as-a-Service (NaaS) trend, and it's targeted at the smaller end of the small and mid-sized business market. Pertino's sweet spot is that it could eliminate the need for SMBs to invest in traditional networking hardware or hire someone to manage a network.

Innovative and easy-to-use for non-networking gurus, Pertino?currently available in Limited Release? has a lot of promising benefits for the SMB and is an exciting development in Networking-as-a-Service, However,? this still nascent solution needs some feature enhancements and is best suited for those with lighter networking needs.

What It Does
Once your Pertino network is created, you can add servers and computers to your network and invite others on the network. Those other users can also add their own devices. Such a network, allows all individuals to share files off of each other's devices and also remote desktop to machines within the created network.

What's great about adding devices is that they do not have to be physical devices. I was easily able to add a Hyper-V virtual machine to my network. For those who have cloud servers created in hosted platforms like Rackspace, 8x8, or Amazon EC2, those server instances can be added to a Pertino network, as well.

For security, the service uses 256-bit encryption for data protection. Pertino's file and desktop sharing is integrated tightly with the Windows operating system, so you are using the local folder permissions in Windows. You can only access files in remote device's folders that are shared in Windows and you must have network discovery enabled on all machines. Remote Desktop also has to be enabled on every machine you want to remotely access. For sharing files and remotely connecting, a user has to have the local Windows login credentials to the machine he or she wants to access files from or remote desktop into.

For ease-of-use, Pertino's service leverages Windows' inherent functionality: customers use Windows' Remote Desktop Service for remote access and use Windows Explorer to access folder shares. If you are familiar with Windows tasks such as enabling remote desktop sessions, or setting up folder shares, you will have no problem with configuring Windows properly to work within your Pertino network. Mac users and others not as familiar with Windows settings may be a bit confused by what is required to configure within the Windows operating system. Luckily, Pertino's website features videos that walk you through the needed steps to share files and use remote desktop.

Subscribing and Pricing
Pertino's subscription model begins with a free Personal plan that allows customers to build a cloud network with up to three members with three devices each. This level of subscription is not only targeted to small businesses, but a family for example, could build a network for sharing photos and files or remotely troubleshooting another family member's machine.

From there, pricing is $10 per month, per user as networking needs increase.

Source: http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ziffdavis/pcmag/~3/xnqOt55-HsI/0,2817,2415716,00.asp

metro north taco bell taco bell Breezy Point Seaside Heights nj transit PSEG

Friday, February 22, 2013

Controversial dam removals founded on value conflicts

Controversial dam removals founded on value conflicts [ Back to EurekAlert! ] Public release date: 22-Feb-2013
[ | E-mail | Share Share ]

Contact: Dolly Jrgensen
dolly@jorgensenweb.net
46-090-786-6553
Umea University

Researchers at Ume University in Sweden conclude that public opposition to dam removal is not based on knowledge deficiency, as is sometimes argued in dam removal science. It is instead a case of different understandings and valuation of the environment and the functions it provides. The findings are now published in the journal Ecology and Society.

Dam removal is an increasingly common practice as old splash dams and small hydropower dams have become obsolete. Although the removal of these dams has ecological benefits by restoring rivers to their former courses, local residents sometimes contest dam removals.

"We wanted to understand how the proponents and opponents of dam removal think about the function of two contrasting ecosystems an existing dam with a pond and a potential running stream without the pond. The local people who fight to have a dam remain in place have often been dismissed as unknowledgeable," says Dolly Jrgensen, environmental historian at the Department of Ecology and Environmental Science.

Together with ecologist Birgitta Malm-Renflt, she investigated the types of arguments made for and against dam removal in newspaper articles about dams in the Swedish towns Alby, Hallstahammar, Orsa, and Tallsen.

They found that those who want to remove the dam place a high value on the return of game fish to the ecosystem, recreational fishing, and restoration in general. Opponents want the dam to remain because of recreational opportunities for bathing and beaches, the aesthetics of the pond's still water, and the cultural heritage of the pond and the historic dam.

"The public opposition is not based on knowledge deficiency, where more information would lead to better ecological decision-making. The locals simply value different aspects of the environment than scientists or environmentalists that want the dam removed, " says Dolly Jrgensen.

As the number of dam removal projects continues to grow in Sweden and other places in the world, controversies are likely to become more common. Because a decision to remove or keep the dam will result in one side losing the ecosystem services they value, compromise solutions may be difficult to reach.

###

Original publication:

Jrgensen, D. and B. Malm Renflt. 2013. Damned If You Do, Dammed If You Don't: Debates on Dam Removal in the Swedish Media. Ecology and Society 18 (1): 18. [online] URL:

http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol18/iss1/art18/


[ Back to EurekAlert! ] [ | E-mail | Share Share ]

?


AAAS and EurekAlert! are not responsible for the accuracy of news releases posted to EurekAlert! by contributing institutions or for the use of any information through the EurekAlert! system.


Controversial dam removals founded on value conflicts [ Back to EurekAlert! ] Public release date: 22-Feb-2013
[ | E-mail | Share Share ]

Contact: Dolly Jrgensen
dolly@jorgensenweb.net
46-090-786-6553
Umea University

Researchers at Ume University in Sweden conclude that public opposition to dam removal is not based on knowledge deficiency, as is sometimes argued in dam removal science. It is instead a case of different understandings and valuation of the environment and the functions it provides. The findings are now published in the journal Ecology and Society.

Dam removal is an increasingly common practice as old splash dams and small hydropower dams have become obsolete. Although the removal of these dams has ecological benefits by restoring rivers to their former courses, local residents sometimes contest dam removals.

"We wanted to understand how the proponents and opponents of dam removal think about the function of two contrasting ecosystems an existing dam with a pond and a potential running stream without the pond. The local people who fight to have a dam remain in place have often been dismissed as unknowledgeable," says Dolly Jrgensen, environmental historian at the Department of Ecology and Environmental Science.

Together with ecologist Birgitta Malm-Renflt, she investigated the types of arguments made for and against dam removal in newspaper articles about dams in the Swedish towns Alby, Hallstahammar, Orsa, and Tallsen.

They found that those who want to remove the dam place a high value on the return of game fish to the ecosystem, recreational fishing, and restoration in general. Opponents want the dam to remain because of recreational opportunities for bathing and beaches, the aesthetics of the pond's still water, and the cultural heritage of the pond and the historic dam.

"The public opposition is not based on knowledge deficiency, where more information would lead to better ecological decision-making. The locals simply value different aspects of the environment than scientists or environmentalists that want the dam removed, " says Dolly Jrgensen.

As the number of dam removal projects continues to grow in Sweden and other places in the world, controversies are likely to become more common. Because a decision to remove or keep the dam will result in one side losing the ecosystem services they value, compromise solutions may be difficult to reach.

###

Original publication:

Jrgensen, D. and B. Malm Renflt. 2013. Damned If You Do, Dammed If You Don't: Debates on Dam Removal in the Swedish Media. Ecology and Society 18 (1): 18. [online] URL:

http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol18/iss1/art18/


[ Back to EurekAlert! ] [ | E-mail | Share Share ]

?


AAAS and EurekAlert! are not responsible for the accuracy of news releases posted to EurekAlert! by contributing institutions or for the use of any information through the EurekAlert! system.


Source: http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2013-02/uu-cdr022213.php

Tony Scott UFC 151 empire state building Hurricane prince harry hunger games Joey Kovar

Thursday, February 21, 2013

Analysis: Israeli government hints at new peace talks

Ronen Zvulun / Reuters

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu signed his first coalition partner in centrist Tzipi Livni, a move that could get a nod of approval from peace activists and U.S. President Barack Obama. But how cohesive any message of peace will be depends largely on the makeup of the rest of the coalition.

By Martin Fletcher, Correspondent, NBC News

News analysis

TEL AVIV -- In the Middle Eastern bazaar, the first sale of the day is prized beyond any other. It is called the ?siftach,? and to clinch the deal the seller gives a discount to the buyer, to launch a good day?s business.

In the case of the agreement announced Wednesday between Likud Beitenu leader Benjamin Netanyahu and Tzipi Livni, leader of? ?Hatnua? (Movement) to join a coalition government, Netanyahu was desperate to get one of the several political parties he is negotiating with to be the first to reach agreement.

So to entice Livni to sign, he sweetened his offer to include what Livni dearly wanted: the role of chief peace negotiator with the Palestinians, in addition to the guarantee of the post of justice minister for her and the post of minister of the environment for another member of her party.

Her brief in a new Netanyahu government, then, would be to launch a new peace process with the Palestinians, according to the published agreement, ?with the aim of reaching a settlement with them that will put an end to the conflict.?

The significance of this is that the responsibility passes from the foreign minister, who loudly proclaimed that he did not believe in peace with the Palestinians, to Livni, who does.

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is still in charge, but he may no longer be Israel's most consequential politician. The Daily Rundown's Chuck Todd takes a "deep dive" into the new face of Israeli politics, Yair Lapid.

In addition to being the first step toward forming Netanyahu?s third government, it allows him to send a signal to U.S. President Barack Obama, expected in Israel on his first state visit next month, that he is serious about moving toward peace and that Obama should support him; Netanyahu?s relationship with Obama is famously fraught.

What this means in practice, however, is far from clear. It depends on who else joins Netanyahu and Livni in building a coalition government. Pundits expect Netanyahu to focus his attention next on the Labor party, as well as a couple of the religious Jewish parties, and only then to go for broke -- to offer a role to the two young newcomers, one on the left and one on the right, who have surprisingly found common cause.

The question: Can Netanyau pull off a brilliant ploy and form a government without the second- and third-largest parties, Yair Lapid?s ?Yesh Atid? (There is a Future) and Naftali Bennett?s Bait Hayehudi (Jewish Home)?

Or is it so brilliant? When the voters speak clearly and give the second- and third-largest number of votes to two new parties with new leaders and a large majority of new members of parliament, shouldn?t this call for change be reflected in any new government?

The problem is, and this brings us back to Livni?s role as peace negotiator, Bennett and Lapid, who agree on many social and economic issues, could not be further apart on the central question: What about the Palestinians? Bennett is absolutely clear: No Palestinian state. Lapid is with Livni.

So is there a real change in the Israeli government?s position vis a vis peace talks? As always, Netanyahu is hard to read. Does he really want Livni to take Israel down the road to compromise and peace? Or does he just want to form a new government so badly that he will offer any enticement to make it happen?

Cynics argue the latter. Some others believe that maybe a miracle is at hand.

And as Israel?s first president, David Ben Gurion, once said: To be a pragmatist in Israel, you have to believe in miracles.

Martin Fletcher is the author of "The List," "Breaking News" and "Walking Israel."

Related:

Fatah, Hamas hold talks ahead of possible negotiations with Israel

UN panel: Israel must withdraw all settlers from the West Bank

Surprisingly centrist vote has Netanyahu reaching to the left

This story was originally published on

Source: http://worldnews.nbcnews.com/_news/2013/02/21/17031818-what-about-palestinians-israeli-coalition-may-be-hard-pressed-to-answer?lite

andy cohen andy cohen mozambique oosthuizen great expectations jake owen oosthuizen louis

The end of doomsday predictions isn't near

Guillaume Horcajuelo / EPA

Two men dressed in tinfoil stand in the French village of Bugarach. The mountain near Bugarach was touted as a haven from the Maya apocalypse last December. The mountain survived, as did everything else.

By Stephanie Pappas
LiveScience

Y2K? A bust. Judgment Day 2011? As quiet as a mouse. The Mayan apocalypse? Certainly not now.

As they have throughout history, failed doomsday predictions come and go. But with the Pope resigning, an asteroid whizzing near the planet Friday?and a completely unrelated space rock exploding over Russia, it seems a good time to ask: What's next?

Plenty, as it turns out. Previous failures have in no way shut down doomsday predictors, and dates are set for possible apocalypses in 2020, 2040, 2060 and 2080 (zeros have an appeal, apparently). One of these doomsdays was even predicted by Sir Isaac Newton himself.

"It's clear that these kinds of scenarios return over and over and over again," said John Hoopes, an archaeologist at the University of Kansas who has studied doomsday predictions.

The end is nigh
Doomsday prophecies date back thousands of years. The ancient Persians kicked off the hobby of apocalypse predictingin the Western world, Saint Joseph's University professor Allen Kerkeslager told LiveScience in December 2012. When the Zoroastrian Persians conquered the ancient Jews, they passed their end-of-the-world beliefs into Jewish culture, which subsequently handed them to Christianity. Now, everyone from Protestant preachers such as Harold Camping, who predicted Armageddon in 2011, to UFO cultists and New Age mystics occasionally jump on the doomsday train.?

The most recent apocalypse prediction was tied to the Mayan calendar, even though actual Mayans and scholars who study ancient Maya culture pointed out repeatedly that the calendar was never meant to predict the end of the world. The appointed day (Dec. 21, 2012) came and went without fire and brimstone.

But failures haven't stopped aspiring doomsday prophets in the past. In one of the most notorious apocalypse failures ever, American Baptist preacher William Miller predicted the return of Jesus Christ on March 21, 1844. Nothing happened, so Miller and his followers revised the prediction to Oct. 22. When that day, too, passed without incident, it was dubbed the Great Disappointment. [Oops! 11 Failed Doomsday Predictions]

Likewise, Camping predicted the Rapture three times in 1994 before his 2011 predictions.

The Pope's doomsday
So it should come as no surprise that doomsday believers have plenty of dates to fixate on in the future. Friday's ultimately harmless asteroid flyby may trigger more anxiety about world-ending asteroid impacts in the near future, Hoopes told LiveScience. A Friday morning meteor explosion that shattered windows and injured more than 1,000 in Russia is likely to do the same.

The surprise announcement of the resignation of Pope Benedict XVI last week has also triggered doomsday chatter.

In 1595, a Benedictine monk published a series of prophecies he claimed came straight from the pen of a 12th-century archbishop, Saint Malachy. The prophecies are short phrases, each said by future interpreters to match up with a particular pope. For example, the phrase "out of the guardian goose" has been linked to Pope Alexander III (1159-1181), because his family coat of arms sported an image of a goose.

Pope John Paul II (1978-2005) is said to match the 110th phrase on the list, "from the labor of the sun," because he was born and entombed on days when there were solar eclipses. That makes Benedict XVI number 111, "the glory of the olive." A monastic order founded by the saint from whom Benedict took his name has a branch known as the Olivetans, though Benedict himself is not one of them.

Here's where the prophecies ? which are completely discredited by the Catholic Church and suspected to be forgeries ? get fun. Line 112 reads, "In the extreme persecution of the Holy Roman Church there will sit Peter the Roman, who will nourish the sheep in many tribulations; when they are finished, the city of seven hills will be destroyed and the dreadful judge will judge his people. The end." [End of the World? Top Doomsday Fears]

So is the next Pope the last before the apocalypse? History may not bear out any doomsday predictions, but prognosticators such as Thomas Horn and Cris Putnam, authors of "Petrus Romanus: The Final Pope is Here" (Defender, 2012) certainly think this one has legs. The theory has the advantage of involving the Catholic Church, an institution often accused of conspiracy. Conspiracy theoriesare often a component of popular doomsday theories, Hoopes said.

Successful predictions have to "hook into some deeper fears," he said.

Any day now
If the Pope prophecies don't pan out, there's plenty more to see. Numerologists have placed bets on both 2040 and 2080, interpretations that come from the Jewish text the Talmud and the Islamic holy book the Quran.

Psychic Jeane Dixon, who became famous through her newspaper astrology column and who often touted herself as having predicted John F. Kennedy's assassination, claimed that Armageddon would come in 2020. But though Dixon did occasionally make predictions that seemed to pan out, she was frequently wrong, as a 1980 article in the Lakeland Ledger pointed out. For example, Dixon predicted that Fidel Castro's days were numbered in 1968 (Castro is still alive and remained in office until 2011). She also said the two-party system of government would vanish from the United States by 1978, which would come as news to today's Democrats and Republicans.

Dixon, who died in 1997, was so famous that Temple University mathematician John Allen Paulos named the phenomenon of someone advertising correct predictions while ignoring many more failed ones the "Jeane Dixon effect."

But Dixon's fame has nothing on Sir Isaac Newton, the famed mathematician who figured out the principals of gravity. Newton had a side interest in apocalypse speculation, it turns out. A devout Christian, Newton was wary of human fallibility in interpreting prophecies, according to Stephen Snobelen of the University of King's College in Nova Scotia, who has researched Newton's writings. But he did muse in private about the date of doomsday, adding up important biblical numbers to arrive at 2060.

On the other hand, Newton would not have wanted a reputation as a doomsday predictor, Snobelen wrote in a statement. In his musing on 2060, Newton wrote, "It may end later, but I see no reason for its ending sooner. This I mention not to assert when the time of the end shall be, but to put a stop to the rash conjectures of fanciful men who are frequently predicting the time of the end, & by doing so bring the sacred prophesies into discredit as often as their predictions fail."

Follow Stephanie Pappas on Twitter @sipappasor LiveScience @livescience. We're also on Facebook? and? Google+.

Copyright 2013 LiveScience, a TechMediaNetwork company. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Source: http://science.nbcnews.com/_news/2013/02/19/17020685-the-end-of-doomsday-predictions-isnt-near?lite

the quiet man yellow cab dropkick murphys guernsey nit colcannon dystonia